In each of these examples, if we are to have any
understanding of what’s going on, we have to stretch our imagination, and try
to think ourselves into someone else’s circumstances. In the modern idiom, we must think outside
the box.
When Jesus was brought before Pilate, indeed through all his
examinations, by the Sanhedrin, by Pilate and by Herod, Jesus saw everything in
the context of His purpose for coming to earth. “The scriptures must be
fulfilled,” He said (Mark 14:49), “You will see the Son of Man sitting at the
right hand of the Mighty One” (Mark 14:62).
He acknowledged that He was the Son of God (Luke 22:70), and ‘King of
the Jews’ (Luke 23:3), but He offered no defence against the charges that were
made against Him (Matt. 27:12-14). If we
were in that position, I’m sure we would want to offer some contradiction, to
explain the ‘real reasons’ why our actions had suffered this
misinterpretation. Not Jesus. He understood what was going on. He could see that the Jewish leaders were
incapable of rejecting the legal rigmarole that had grown up over the preceding
centuries – it was the only culture they knew: how could a mere carpenter’s Son
have the power or knowledge to overturn it?
It may not be written in our Creed, but aren’t we all
obliged to copy Jesus’ example so far as we are able? If we could only try to see everything from
other people’s viewpoint as well as our own, I’m sure all kinds of
relationships would be the better for it.