"I don't bother with Christmas these days - it's just for the children, after all, isn't it?" - how often have you heard that? Countless times, I'll warrant. And is it true? (I'll come back to that question later.) What do people mean when they ask it, though? I suggest that they're really saying that all the razzamataz of the 'High Street Christmas" is what they are rejecting: the special food, that only comes out once a year, like dates, nuts, crystalized fruits, the little bacon/sausage bundles and plum pudding; and the toys that seem to grow more intricate and more expensive with each year that passes, and with an equal and opposite progression in their reliability, too. And they stop giving Christmas cards, too, because it costs far more now to post them - even second class - than the cost of the card.
So, "I don't bother with Christmas these days." And what about that other claim, "it's just for the children, isn't it?" Well, yes, certainly some aspects, the toys, and some of the carols too, are aimed at children. I for one can't precisely remember when I last unpacked a Christmas present and discovered a toy. And as one's own children grow up, one's interest in child-focussed celebrations wanes. Then along come the grandchildren, whose lifestyle is far from one's own. Now, you might think that they bring with them a replenishment of the 'children' aspect of Christmas, but by the time we are grandparents, time has moved on, and what we enjoyed with our own children is no longer fashionable, or even, perhaps, available. To a certain extent the grandchildren, dear souls though they are, are a distinct intrusion into the quieter lifestyle that has become our own.
Christmas, then, is better without the children, for whom we once thought it was intended. What are we to do with it? Can we ignore it, totally? No, of course not. For one thing the culture of the whole nation is geared not only to having Christmas and Boxing Days off work, but also as much of the ensuing fortnight as the chiefs of industry and commerce will allow. We're not at work, but we're not bothering with Christmas, so shall we go off somewhere for a holiday? Anywhere close and affordable (if there is anywhere like that in a recession) isn't exactly having holiday weather, so unless we spend an absolute fortune (that we haven't got) that's not on the cards either.
One more thing that we can't do is to roll back the years, to the great times we had in our own childhood - to the times when Christmas really was for the children - or so we thought. Someone asked me the other day to think back to one of the greatest parties I could remember; after just a little thought, my mind went back to when I was about five, to a Christmas spent around my grandparents' table, in a cottage festooned with paper streamers, and great paper bells hanging from the beams. The company consisted of my parents and me, my grandparents, and their only other surviving child, along with her husband and daughter: a nice even gathering of eight, who played games in twos or fours, opened presents seemingly without number, and ate the food that the three family units had undoubtedly clubbed together to provide. The men smoked their pipes without restriction, and the ladies sipped the port or sherry that was reserved for this occasion, and we children were blissfully unaware whether or not we got under everybody's feet, or were a nuisance, because in the spirit of the day we wouldn't have been told off, even if we had been.
Was this what Christmas was all about? If so, then there's little wonder that we 'don't bother with Christmas these days.' Times have changed, but our idea of Christmas hasn't. It's stuck in the past.
What of the 'real' Christmas, though? I listened tonight to some carols. Most of them were old favourites, many dating from the Victorian era, but not all by far. As the familiar words of each one told its particular aspect of the tale - the couple looking for somewhere to stay because the town was crowded on account of the census; the angels appearing with their good news for the shepherds; the great trek performed by the wise men with their precious gifts; and the great significance of this baby born in the humble surroundings of a stable - the words echoed in my mind and heart, not taking me back to my childhood, or to later times when I might have sung them in a choir, but back centuries beyond any personal recollection to the one time in the history of the world when God Himself appeared on earth in human form, with the express purpose of rescuing mankind from the mess that he had made of his world ... and continues so to do.
In the third line of this article I asked 'and is it true?' and said I'd come back to that question. As it appeared, it referred to the matter of Christmas being for the children, but that wasn't exactly what I meant, hence coming back to it now. When I hear that question, 'and is it true?' I'm reminded of a poem I first heard about thirty years ago (although it is at least twice as old) by John Betjeman:
"And is it true? and is it true,
This most tremendous tale of all,
Seen in a stained-glass window's hue,
A Baby in an ox's stall?
The Maker of the stars and sea
Become a Child on earth for me?
And is it true? For if it is,
No loving fingers tying strings
Around those tissued fripperies,
The sweet and silly Christmas things,
Bath salts and inexpensive scent
And hideous tie so kindly meant,
No love that in a family dwells,
No carolling in frosty air,
Nor all the steeple-shaking bells
Can with this single Truth compare -
That God was man in Palestine
And lives today in Bread and Wine."
These are the last three, and to my mind the most poignant, of eight. If you have time this Christmas day, read all eight here. Like my response to 'your greatest party', they take one's mind back to the familiar Christmasses of yesteryear, but also explain, as I've tried to indicate here, that there is a greater significance to Christmas than anything we can buy, send, imagine, conjour up or cobble together. There is a 'real' meaning to it that will outlast anyone and everyone's memory - the eternal truth of Immanuel - God with us.
I wish a truly Blessed Christmas to all my readers.
Monday, 24 December 2012
Sunday, 16 December 2012
Begotten, not Created
I can picture the woman now: I think she was a
character in a TV play many years ago. She said, in a cockney accent,
"Don't ought to be allowed, all that begettin'; 'tain't natch'ral."
She was referring to the opening verses of St. Matthew's gospel. Although, of
course, it is natural, the most natural thing in the world, until recent
years the whole question of procreation was taboo in polite society. You just
didn’t talk about such things, so why should they appear as a long list at the
very start of the New Testament?
In common with many others,
over the last decade or so I've been tracing my family history. In so doing, I
have realised one possible reason for these Biblical genealogies. In the course
of my researches I have made contact with a number of cousins, many of whom, in
addition to being distantly related to me, are distantly related to each other,
and also live thousands of miles apart. What is it that links us all?
All of my findings are faithfully recorded in a
computer program, a database which holds the key dates and relationships of
almost 3,000 individuals, some stretching back several centuries. Many times
I've tried to show on one sheet of paper the linkage, over six or seven
generations, between my distant cousins and myself: to see, if you like, how we
all hang together. I soon discovered that it needed to be a very large piece of
paper if all the names and dates were to be read.
This effort was in response to
a desire to bring these names to life. Although in one sense the people named
were quite real, having sent me an e-mail or Christmas card, yet in a strange
way they were no more than business contacts, or fellow townspeople. Until I
had spanned the generations and seen those links, they didn’t have that special
feel: that they belonged to me; that they were part of my family.
I suspect that Matthew, as he
wrote his Gospel for Jewish readers, felt a similar need to explain that Jesus
was not just a character in another historic epic. He needed to demonstrate Jesus’ roots as one
from the family of Israel, part of their own history and tradition, as well as
being divinely conceived to be the means of God;s redemptive plan.
Just as my cousins are special
to me, so Jesus is special to us all, as individuals, and we to Him. In his letter to the Galatians, Paul says
that we are all children of God; heirs with (and so spiritual brothers of)
Christ (Gal. 3:26-29.) While I have to
resort to e-mails and letters to communicate with my faraway cousins, we can
all be assured of Jesus’ presence with us – not just at Christmas time, but
always – in the form of the Holy Spirit that He has placed in our hearts.
Sunday, 2 December 2012
Heaven Alongside
The Girton
Interchange at the top of the M11 is a junction the like of which I’ve seen
nowhere else in ten years of professional driving. While two lanes of northbound traffic pass
unhindered, scarcely noticing the change from M11 to A14, just feet away on the
other side of the barrier an exciting transition is happening, at speeds of up
to 60 mph. Motorway traffic slowing down
to turn east changes place with westbound A14 traffic accelerating to follow
their route north. It sounds quite
dangerous, but all the drivers seem to realise that in those few hundred yards every
vehicle will be swapping sides, and it all seems to work out quite smoothly.
If you are
wondering what this has to do with Christmas and the Incarnation, I invite you
to check out the relevant verses, which are these: Luke 2:9, John 1:5, John 3:4 and Acts 1:9-11.
When the A14
route was created, it involved very little new construction, and in large part
consisted of re-numbering and upgrading existing roads. This junction involves negotiating a complex
manoeuvre simply to stay on the same route, and drivers using it for the first
time are a little cautious, wondering just where all the traffic around them is
going.
So imagine
poor country folk, doing what they’ve done every winter night for centuries:
looking after their animals on the hillside.
All of a sudden they are surrounded by shining lights, heavenly voices
and the sweetest music they’ve heard in their lives. Little wonder that they were terrified. At the start of John’s Gospel, the evangelist
gives an overview of Jesus’ mission on earth.
It is characteristic of virtually all of the Gospel story that His
teaching seemed completely opposite to the accepted ways of the world. His sayings were often confusing to those who
heard them; the comment by Nicodemus is only one example of many.
Some 17
miles after Girton, the A14 road approaches Huntingdon, and by now drivers have
got used to the volume of traffic, which includes many heavy lorries and is
often as great as on a three-lane motorway.
No one knows which of the adjacent vehicles is heading for the midlands
and which for the north, until a junction turns the A14 traffic off to the west
again, leaving the remainder to join the A1(M).
It’s something of a surprise if you’re not expecting it.
After three
years, and the upheaval that the death - and then the resurrection - of their
supernatural friend had inflicted on what had become a new way of life, the
disciples must have been absolutely flabberghasted when, in the middle of
talking with them about the coming Spirit ... suddenly he was with them no
longer, but instead two men in white, explaining that he’d been taken up into
heaven!
And one day
He’ll return – let us renew our resolve this advent to be ready, whenever that
may be.
Friday, 23 November 2012
Strike a Light
One of the many familiar symbols
of Christmas that are not exclusively Christian is the lighted candle. Alongside the snow scenes, the crinolined
ladies, the robins and the santas, it adorns many of the cards that will shortly be dropping
through our letterbox. Maybe you've already bought the ones you'll be sending, and many of them will have candles in their design.
What can the lowly candle tell us?
There used to be an expression,
a euphemism for the act of dying, that is less common
nowadays: ‘snuffing it’. This was indeed a very
accurate term, for as the body dies, it's as if the light of human life is being ‘snuffed out’,
like the flame of a candle. So the candle flame represents life.
The flame itself is in two
parts. Outside is the part we see, the
bright light that illuminates the space around it; in the centre is the dark part
where the action takes place. This is the
hottest part, and melts the wax of the candle, turning it into a vapour ready to be
burned. As it burns, the vapour gives us the light
we value so much. Our analogy continues, for life is like that, isn't it? It has a
controlled inner part, known only to ourselves, and a bright outer part that is seen by
everyone, and able to affect others.
Effort is required to
convert the fuel available – whether it’s food for our bodies or knowledge
for our intellect – into a form that can nourish us. If we don’t do this, then life will be very limited,
in terms of either time or intensity, or both.
But lives that are nourished in this way provide rich rewards. According to the King James Version of our
Bibles, Jesus referred to a candle in just this way (Matthew 5:15-16). A life that is constantly fed with physical
or spiritual nourishment, or both, is a source of strength, enlightenment and
enrichment to others around it.
I'm sure Christmas won't pass without your seeing a candle somewhere, whether on a card, in a picture, or in real life: perhaps in church. If you light a candle this
Christmas, take a moment to study it closely, and reflect just how closely it
mirrors the truths of life itself, a life that was shared for just a short time by God's own Son.
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
The Parable at the Chemist's
Life can be tiresome at times, not least when you're in a hurry. You’ve probably suffered the same frustration that I
experienced recently when I tried to buy some cough medicine. The assistant was about to take my money when
she suddenly realised, “I’m sorry – I
can’t sell this to you at the moment – the pharmacist’s just popped out.”
Sometimes in church - or in other places, too, I suppose - we use an expression of completeness, 'body, mind and spirit.' It may seem perverse, therefore, to break this down into its constituent parts. As I waited for the return of the medical professional whose absence was holding me up, I had the chance to reflect on the
strange quirk of the Medicines Act that requires not that the pharmacist should make
the sale (body), nor even that he should see the sale take place (mind), but
simply that he should be on the premises at the time (spirit).
I decided that the powers that the Act confers on the pharmacist can teach
us something about sin. Just as the
authority of the pharmacist pervades his whole emporium, so sin influences all
of our being. There are, of course,
those obvious sins that we commit with our own bodies, which we can compare to the idea of the pharmacist selling the product over the counter himself. But how often do we consider
as our own sins those times when we see someone else doing wrong and take no
action to prevent or report it - comparable to the proprietorial oversight of the sale taking place? And
which of us can claim that we’ve never been present in a building, or been part of an
organisation, or a citizen of a country where sin takes place somewhere, even if we don't actually see it?
Now, we are told that the sinner who repents is assured of being forgiven (e.g.
in James 5:15), and we are taught that true repentance involves a change of habit
or lifestyle. But here's a greater challenge. Is there some way in which
we can contribute to repentance at a higher level – perhaps by boldly offering
a choice word at the right time (Matthew 10:19-20)?
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Who Moved?
In the
course of my family history research I’ve followed one line after another through
the years of the Great War, imagining young men who, in their thousands,
forsook horse and plough at the call of the recruiting office; young men whose
loyalty was stirred and enthusiasm aroused, only to be so quickly and
completely overturned by the mess, the destruction and the sheer horror of the
Western Front. It was so terrible that,
right into old age and sometimes to the point of death, many would not talk of
their experiences. For those involved,
whether in battle or at home, it was a time of immense and irreversible
change. Life was never the same again:
it was indeed a Great event.
It’s easy to
say that the war was started by the assassination of the Austrian heir, the
archduke Franz Ferdinand. But there was
already widespread discontent across Europe, from Ulster to the Balkans, results
of class difference, oppression, nationalism, and so on. Alongside this were rivalries over the ‘new
lands’ of Africa, over-ripe for colonial exploitation. Once
the spark had been kindled, war was inevitable.
A recent
radio programme touched on the problems encountered by western armies who find
themselves operational in the Moslem world.
The presenter spoke of a failure to appreciate the extent to which
politics are [still] inseparable from religion in those lands, and said that
the same was true of this country several centuries ago, “but we have moved
on.” His tone implied progress, but I’m
not so sure.
Consider the
causes of war, action and reaction; if these are out of proportion, war can be
the result. Whether it was the Unionist
reaction to the passing of the Home Rule Bill, or the supressed aspirations of
the various nation-groups of central Europe, actions and reactions could have
been different, more generous, less selfish; there could have been less
insistence on an eye for an eye (Ex. 21:24), more turning of the other cheek (Mt.
5:38-39.) How far so-called Christian Europe
had ‘progressed’ from the backward and Biblical ways of earlier centuries!
And, almost
a century later, are we at last enjoying some benefit from that ‘War to end
Wars’? Dissatisfaction, resentment and
misrepresentation still abound, and have been joined by other ills. That radio presenter said, “it used to be like that here”, i.e. we used to live close to God, with respect
for Him and His creation, with a fear of judgement, and a realistic expectation
that the sinful would be damned. No one
has seen or heard a pronouncement from Heaven during those intervening
centuries, relaxing God’s commands, reducing His expectations of mankind. Such a pronouncement would have overturned
those words written to the Hebrews, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today
and for ever” (Heb. 13:8), and re-written our Bibles in many ways.
“If you’re
not close to God, guess who moved,” invited a famous poster. Perhaps it’s time we moved back!
Sunday, 21 October 2012
What a Super Market!
It's now many years since I was first invited into Lynda's kitchen. Hers was the sort of home where conversation normally followed her around the house, and as often as not gravitated to the kitchen. Without knowing anything about the town where she lived, it was apparent
that Sainsbury’s wasn’t far away. At
least seven out every ten items bore that familiar name. Clearly, she trusted their quality and wasn’t
afraid to show it on her shelves.
I once heard that the expression
“eternal life” in our Bibles could be translated as “the life of
eternity”, indicating that we don't have to wait until death for it to begin.
Substitute "Sainsbury’s” for "eternity", and revisit my friend’s kitchen.
She certainly lived “the life of Sainsbury’s”, and did so daily in her
own home. Her lifestyle illustrates the same point. She didn’t have to be at the store to live the life – she only went there
to replenish her supplies.
Now think again about eternal
life. We don’t have to wait for heaven
in order to experience it. It can start
for us here and now. All we have to do
is believe. Jesus said, “whoever hears
my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life” (John 5:24). What about replenishing our supplies? We certainly don’t have to go to heaven for
that. We can read our Bibles and be in
touch with God in prayer right in our homes, and the teaching that can really
bring that Word to life is available (as they say in the adverts for the famous Alpha Course), “at a
church near you.”
In some churches the
last Sunday in October is celebrated as ‘Bible Sunday’; if you don’t already
have a daily practice of Bible reading, what better time to begin? If you are uncertain about what in particular to read, or how to find a way in - it is a big book after all; in fact it's a whole library in one volume - there are many daily guides available, or can be found online too. You could do worse than look here for starters.
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
The Obstacle Race
What a great summer it's been for sport. All the usual selection - cricket, horse-racing, yachting, and golf - have been overshadowed by what some have declared to be the greatest Olympic Games of all time. It's turned my mind back to sports day at my junior school, and one event that will never make it to the Olympics. Once the serious business of the day had been
decided, the highlight for entertainment was the obstacle race. We started off running in sacks - making sure
that one foot was in each corner to maximise movement potential - and then,
after negotiating hoops, hurdles and other hazards on the way, we were allowed
to emerge from these encumbrances ready to enter the Tarpaulin.
This
great green sheet, pegged down at the sides, was the Final Decider, and
reversed the fortunes of many a hopeful competitor. It was heavy enough to
defeat the speed of the strongest, and dark enough to confuse the sense of
direction of many. (Sadly, it also
afforded the opportunity to cheat: to sabotage the opposition by an attack in
the darkness)! To the spectators, it was
no small puzzle to determine the identity of the individual humps struggling to
make progress towards the winning tape.
Only one thing was certain: never did the children come out in the same
order as they went in!
It’s
not just nostalgia. There is a parallel,
I think, between that tarpaulin on the sports field and the effect on us as we
come to Faith. Almost certainly, the
first ones to reach the tarpaulin would be those who were the better runners,
athletically the strongest in the school.
Often those to emerge first would be the least expected to win. Perhaps they had certain skills which wouldn’t
otherwise be called into play in the regular races - or maybe they were simply
lucky.
Look
around your church: where do you find the strongest faith? Is it among those who earn most, who have the
fastest cars or the biggest houses? Is
it among those who showed the highest IQ, who gained the best university
degrees? Is it among those who have
‘achieved’ in life? Such people have
their undoubted qualities, and it should never be suggested that they cannot
have great faith, too. But these
attributes don’t determine our level of faith - this is totally independent of
any other facet of our lives, and is the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Jesus
faced an unenviable challenge in teaching his disciples. We can read in St Mark ch.10 how he responded
to the question of wealth and the Kingdom (“many who are first will be last,
and the last first”), only to be confronted by the ambition of James and John
(“you don’t know what you are asking!”).
The chapter concludes with the faith of the blind man (“your faith has
healed you”). It is often said that
Jesus’ teaching turned the ways of the world upside down, and we can learn much
from this chapter. In particular, let’s
resolve not to be sceptical about the faith of others around us. Perhaps we should also be prepared to accept
that God may be calling us more actively into His service, too.
Which
hump in the tarpaulin are you? You may
be nearer the tape than you think!
Sunday, 30 September 2012
Traffic has Changed ...
SatNav tells
me, “Traffic has changed; there is a faster route.” This even happens in the middle of the night,
when I’m quite sure there is no traffic problem on my route. Over time, I’ve realised that this is a polite
euphemism, and the real meaning is something like, “I’ve spotted that you
weren’t going my way; I’ve realised which way you might be going; would you
like me to tell you how long it’ll take you to get there your way?” You might call it spin, or a sub-text. There’s a lot of it around these days.
How do you
feel when you realise that there’s a sub-text to what someone is telling you? Are you annoyed at an attempt to deceive? Do you simply accept that they are trying to
claim undue credit? Or do you, like me, feel a smug satisfaction that you’ve
understood what is really going on?
The media
seems to deliver a lot of spin these days; famously, much of it comes from
politicians. Take, for example, public
expressions of condolence for the victims of tragedy, such as the reading of
the latest casualty list from Afghanistan at Prime Minister’s Questions. I confess to a cynical appraisal of this,
wondering just how sincere are the feelings being expressed. Then there’s the political guest who rudely
ignores an interviewer’s question, blindly ploughing on instead with his own policy
statement? It’s as if their acceptance
of an invitation to be interviewed is simply viewed as an opportunity to put
their message across.
Fundamentalism
may be unpopular but, put bluntly, aren’t all these simply bald untruths? If something is said insincerely, or with an
ulterior motive, how different is it from telling lies? Do these people – politicians or not, for
many players in the modern world adopt the same strategies – really think that
Mr & Mrs Public are fooled? If we’re
not fooled, but accept this as
normal, just an accepted part of daily life, doesn’t that make us accessories?
As in a recent blog, I turn to the Book of Common Prayer for support, this time to
the services of Morning and Evening Prayer.
In the introduction to the general confession, we are encouraged, that
‘we should not dissemble nor cloke [our sins] before the face of Almighty
God’. These are old words that are no
longer in common use, of course, but the meaning is clear. ‘Cloke’ is simply an early form of the word ‘cloak’,
with the meaning to hide away; as to dissemble, my dictionary comes straight to
the point and defines it as ‘to conceal one’s motives, talk or act
hypocritically; to disguise or conceal.’
And to go right back to basics, the Ninth Commandment says, 'you shall not give false testimony' (Ex.20:16.) Whether it's SatNav, politicians, or other prominent personalities ... or even ourselves ... let's join together to comdemn all forms of false testimony that we encounter in the coming month, and see what happens!
Thursday, 20 September 2012
Turning Cartwheels
Harvest
time is always a difficult one for the preacher. First of all, it’s not a Christian festival,
so there is no obvious Bible story on which to focus our attention. Then, the ‘traditional’ harvest scene is no
longer an integral part in the lives of most of us, as once was the case. So there is a dilemma: to attempt to
re-create something now consigned to history; to introduce a ‘missionary’
element, and focus on the needs of the third world; or to re-define ‘harvest’
in broader terms of God’s bounty which now comes to us in tins and packets from
the supermarket shelves.
If you read my last blog, when I recalled accompanying
my mum to the cornfield to take my father his tea, you won't be surprised to
learn that for me this time always conjours up pictures which wouldn’t be out
of place illustrating a Thomas Hardy novel: giving thanks for the corn safely
stored in the barn and the straw tidily thatched in the stackyard “’ere the
winter storms begin”.
But
let me draw you to one fine detail from that idyll of harvest past. The corn would be conveyed from field to farm
on a horse-drawn cart, running on two or four wooden wheels. In the centre of the wheel is the hub, and
radiating from it are spokes, joined together at their ends by a rim of wood,
made in four or more pieces, and held in place by an iron tyre.
I
was reminded of the skill of the wheelwright recently when I visited a farm
museum near Cambridge. In a way our
lives resemble those spoked wheels, each spoke representing a separate interest
or sector of life: work, the bowls club, the church, our family, neighbours
along the street, regular social contacts, the pub, and so on. If you see a cartwheel laying on the ground,
you will find that it isn’t actually flat.
The hub is some distance off the ground, supported by the spokes. The wheel is designed that way so that it can
better resist the forces associated with the moving waggon.
Each
of those different sectors is an important part of our life. Together they support us, just as the spokes
of the wheel support the hub, and if a spoke is broken, if we have bad feeling
with someone or some group, our life - the wheel - is the poorer. It is easy to focus our attention on ourselves,
to see ourselves as the all-important hub of a wheel. But just turn the illustration upside down
for a moment (Jesus often did this in his teaching, didn’t He?). If the family, the neighbours and all the
rest are the spokes of our wheel, doesn’t that mean that each of us is also a
spoke of someone else’s wheel? Doesn’t
that place a responsibility on us: a giving, as well as a receiving rôle?
As
we sing those familiar hymns once again this year, ask yourself, “whose harvest
should I be helping to bring home?”
Monday, 10 September 2012
A Chip off the Old Block
At harvest time, I’m reminded especially of
my father. One of my early memories is
of accompanying my mother as she took his tea to him in the harvest field. On the face of it, I’m not much like my
dad. For as long as I can remember he
was a portly fourteen stone compared to my (now admittedly increasing)
twelve. To date I have lived at
eleven different addresses, while dad, in all of his eighty years and two days, moved
house at the ages of three, six and forty-two, and never ventured at all beyond
Norfolk or Suffolk. I was privileged to
spend seven years at the local grammar school.
Dad left school at thirteen or fourteen to work with his brothers on the
farm: I collected ‘O’-levels and ‘A’-levels, but had no siblings.
And yet, more particularly as I grow older,
I notice similarities: that same set of the jaw when puzzled, displeased or
concentrating; the way I put my hand to my face when relaxing with a book. Like dad, my pen sits in my right hand but,
whenever two hands are required for a task, I fit his comfortable Norfolk
description ‘left hand a-fore’.
Jesus resembled his Father. When Philip asked “show us the Father”, our
Lord’s response was, “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father” (John
14:8-9). What greater parental
resemblance could there be?
There are other similarities to
consider. Genesis tells us that we were
created in God’s own image (Gen. 1:27).
How many common characteristics does that give us with our heavenly
Father? Given that statement, we must
accept that at the outset our similarity was 100%, but the influence of the
sinful world in which we live has inevitably reduced that.
We are exhorted to “be perfect, as your
heavenly Father is perfect.” (Mt. 5:48); Matthew also passes on to us the
advice Jesus gave to one young man who sought to comply with this
instruction. “Go, sell your possessions
and give to the poor … … then come, follow me” (Mt. 19:21). Like many instructions, we shouldn’t respond
to this one blindly in isolation - after all, selling all our possessions and
giving away the proceeds would leave us unable to support ourselves: we would
be poor and in need of the give-aways from someone else: an unsustainable
vicious circle.
So what are we to do? Most important is the end of Jesus’s remark:
“follow me.” I have always been inspired
by a quote ascribed to St. Augustine: “Love God and please yourself.” If our first priority is to love our heavenly
Father, to read and study His word - metaphorically to ‘sit at His feet’ - then
our wishes, desires and pleasures will naturally incline to His will. As harvest time comes round again, may I suggest you consider
what is the harvest of your life. Are
you reaping the abundant rewards of resembling your heavenly Father?
Sunday, 2 September 2012
One for me, One for you
It was a busy weekend.
I had spent most of Saturday following up what part of my mind told me
was a crazy idea. I decided that, with
my subscription to a renowned family history database, it ought to be possible
to compile a fairly comprehensive history of the family we’d stayed with for
our summer holidays year after year in my childhood. Yes, it was possible, but one thing led to
another, and it took far longer than I’d expected.
I went to bed on Saturday evening, didn’t sleep too well,
and woke up with a little couplet going through my mind. I don’t think it’s Biblical, but I’ve no idea
where it does come from. “We can’t have all we want ... and we can’t keep all
we have!” Some complementary thoughts as
I carried on with the task the following afternoon led to this article.
At the beginning of the last century concern was being felt
in high places about the growth of our population, and a question was included
in the 1911 census that caused quite a bit of consternation. Its aim was to provide an idea of female
fertility, but a century later it’s proved a boon to the family historian. Every married woman was asked to provide four
numbers. How many years had she been
married; how many children had she borne in her present marriage; how many of
these were still alive, and how many had died?
(Even more useful to people like me, some widowers provided the same information!)
One of the ladies in my research had answered this question,
“9:4:2:2”; in nine years of marriage, she had lost half of her children. The two daughters still living were now aged
eight and seven, but when I compared the birth and death indexes, I found four
possibilities for the others, the oldest of which lived only to two years of
age. How life has improved now. As I wondered just what she must have thought
at the deaths of children so young, I realised that this was par for the
course. Maybe the percentage in this
example was a mite high, but it was quite common for families to lose a
proportion of their children at an early age.
It was as if they were called upon to share their children with God, or death,
or the ‘grim reaper’, depending on the depth of their faith.
While these families might have wanted more children, in
many cases it was an economic certainty that they couldn’t keep all those they
had been blessed with. I broadened out
this thought, and considered how it might have applied to me. As an only child, I have always struggled
with the idea of sharing. The son of a
farm worker, I may not have had all I wanted, but I grew up safe in the
knowledge that anything I did have, I would keep! I now reflected upon Jesus’ story of a rich
man (Luke 12:16-21,) and thought of a line from a hymn that I quoted in a recent article, “here for a season, then above ...”; I also recalled one
of the many beautiful prayers from the Book of Common Prayer, “... comfort and
succour all them, who in this transitory life are in trouble, sorrow, need,
sickness, or any other adversity.”
Not for the first time, something had prompted me to look
with a wider perspective at my
transitory life, and the need to grade what concerns me into the comfortable,
the convenient, the important, and the essential; and to realise just how
little around me actually originates in the last of those categories!
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
Systematic
I’ve never
been sure whether the skills of my friend the Systems Consultant are with
administrative or computer systems. He
certainly demonstrates great facility with computers, whatever his professional
engagement. For my part, I’ve always
found great satisfaction in seeing either sort of system fulfil its intended
purposes smoothly and efficiently just the way it was designed.
The life of
mankind is a system. Created in purity
and perfection as we read in Genesis, the system has been marred, biffed and
battered down the centuries as man has exercised the freedom God provided, but it’s
still a functioning system for all that.
The same is true of our individual lives: born, for the most part, in
wholeness, but as the years pass, sickness or injury can take their toll on our
physical efficiency, as also abuse or mental illness can impair our emotional
systems.
God’s church
is a system, too. It was designed to be
His body on earth, to spread the Gospel, the good news of God’s love for all
mankind, and His provision for our redemption.
In that remarkable book that ends our Bible, the Revelation to John, we
can find letters to seven early churches.
Though broadly similar in structure, each letter is tailored to the
particular needs of the church to which it is addressed, highlighting their
strengths and weaknesses in God’s service.
As we read these letters (Rev. 2:1-3:22), it is worth comparing the
characteristics of those early churches to our own.
There are
many parallels between the church of the first century and that of the
twenty-first. From time to time we find
ourselves fighting opposition from authorities or from the community around
us. We have to test the validity of
religious leaders who may be misguided in their revolutionary ideas, or may in
fact be wisely challenging our own ill-founded practices. We can see, for example, that the people of
Sardis were only going through the motions of being church. Beneath the surface they were really half
asleep (Rev. 3:1-2): their system was in ‘idle mode’. Or look at the Laodiceans, whose riches made
them blind to their real needs. Their
church system was like an engine with too much lubrication: it was clogged up
and, try as it might, it couldn’t run properly.
The church,
though, is composed of individuals. We
can blame ‘the system’, and it’s all too easy for us to claim that any
inefficiency is down to others or the fault of someone else in particular. We have to remember, though, that we are all
cogs in the same engine. As individuals
within the body of the church, we have responsibilities to each other and to
the whole (Rom. 12:5). We are part of
the system: it cannot function as perfectly without us as it can with us. Let’s pray for guidance in the use of those gifts
with which we have been blessed for the good of the whole (I Peter 4:10).
Sunday, 12 August 2012
Signs of Life
It rather stuck in my
mind. As I was waiting to collect some
goods for delivery one day a few weeks ago, drinking in the unusual warmth in
the air, and thinking summer might have arrived at last, I spotted a sign on
a unit across the industrial estate. “A
business with no sign is a sign of no business!” It was crisp, neat and concisely explained the
nature of their product.
Slogans are catchy, occasionally amusing and, above all, they do have this habit of sticking in the mind. I’m sure many of us can recall advertising slogans that were on TV decades ago – perhaps even selling products that are no longer in existence! They make use of one key characteristic of the article – something it does, some need that it alone can fulfil.
At a personal level, most of us have particular sayings that we habitually use. Who of a certain age can forget the detective who said, in almost every episode, “By Timothy!”? He was too much of a gentleman to swear with any stronger oath. Or maybe you remember Jo March in Louisa Alcott’s ‘Little Women’, who would exclaim, “Christopher Columbus!” Fiction apart, our customary sayings, like advertising slogans, can reveal much about us: what we think, what we believe, the way we conduct our lives.
Last year, a key member of the Family History Society to which I belong, died. In a tribute to her in the magazine, reference was made to Jean’s frequent habit of calling her friends and colleagues back to the matter in hand with the words, “Right, let’s get on with it; work to do.”
Signs, sayings and catch phrases are all around us; and our faith provides us with signs, too. The Easter story provides us with a special symbol, probably the sign that, in one form or another, appears most often across the whole world: the Cross. I once had a little bronze, medallion that had belonged to my father (though where he got it from I have no idea!) Sadly I lost it many years ago, but I remember it fondly; its design and inscription are still clear to me now. Around the edge were the words, “In hoc signo vinces”, and in the middle of these was a big, plain cross. Its presence is echoed by the plain wooden cross I now wear every day.
I recently found out the meaning of those words, and perhaps they can be taken as an indicator of hope for us all in these difficult times, “In this sign you will conquer!”
Slogans are catchy, occasionally amusing and, above all, they do have this habit of sticking in the mind. I’m sure many of us can recall advertising slogans that were on TV decades ago – perhaps even selling products that are no longer in existence! They make use of one key characteristic of the article – something it does, some need that it alone can fulfil.
At a personal level, most of us have particular sayings that we habitually use. Who of a certain age can forget the detective who said, in almost every episode, “By Timothy!”? He was too much of a gentleman to swear with any stronger oath. Or maybe you remember Jo March in Louisa Alcott’s ‘Little Women’, who would exclaim, “Christopher Columbus!” Fiction apart, our customary sayings, like advertising slogans, can reveal much about us: what we think, what we believe, the way we conduct our lives.
Last year, a key member of the Family History Society to which I belong, died. In a tribute to her in the magazine, reference was made to Jean’s frequent habit of calling her friends and colleagues back to the matter in hand with the words, “Right, let’s get on with it; work to do.”
Signs, sayings and catch phrases are all around us; and our faith provides us with signs, too. The Easter story provides us with a special symbol, probably the sign that, in one form or another, appears most often across the whole world: the Cross. I once had a little bronze, medallion that had belonged to my father (though where he got it from I have no idea!) Sadly I lost it many years ago, but I remember it fondly; its design and inscription are still clear to me now. Around the edge were the words, “In hoc signo vinces”, and in the middle of these was a big, plain cross. Its presence is echoed by the plain wooden cross I now wear every day.
I recently found out the meaning of those words, and perhaps they can be taken as an indicator of hope for us all in these difficult times, “In this sign you will conquer!”
Tuesday, 31 July 2012
Up the Pole
The other day I was reminded – by a post at the side of the
road – that this summer would have seen my ruby wedding! The story is a simple one, but it also leads
on to a Biblical link as well.
I’d been working late; although it was a main road there was no other traffic. I was driving in thick fog. At one point I was following a white line alongside the car ... but on its left hand side! With a feeling of panic I realised I was going down the wrong side of the road, and started a correcting drift to my left. Suddenly, crash! The car came to an abrupt halt, and my near-side headlamp went out. When I looked at the damage, I found that the lamp had taken the impact from a metal post that was now leaning at about 45 degrees away from the car. At its far end was a sign saying ‘lay by’. I had not only been on the wrong side of the road, but had been driving down a lay-by on the far side!
That incident must have taken place over forty years ago, because I sold that car soon after getting engaged. What brought it to mind was the observation of some roadside posts coated with reflective paint – silver on one side and red on the other – and I thought how useful these are compared to the one I’d hit all those years ago. If that one had been painted thus, I should have seen it, even in fog! At the time, these thoughts offered a convenient illustration to the sermon I was (half-) listening to on my mp3-player. The preacher’s text was Romans chapter 7, where Paul speaks of sin having no power were it not for the law, and asks rhetorically whether the law is sin (vv.7-8.)
The next day I heard the story of Jim Thorpe, which provided another illustration for the same point. Jim was a Native American who won gold medals for both the pentathlon and decathlon at the 1912 Olympic Games. When, early in 1913, it was revealed that, in 1909-10 he had received payment (although only a few dollars) for playing baseball, his medals were taken from him. In his letter of apology he pointed out that he “did not know all about such things.” It wasn’t just that he was unaware of the rule about professionals taking part in the Games; he didn’t know that there were rules!
Whether painted or not, the roadside posts are there to mark the edge of the carriageway. They don’t protect the carriageway from the invasion of the vegetation on the other side of that edge, nor from the cars that drive on it. Whether known or not, the Olympic rules are there, not to protect the reputation of Games, but to define each competitor’s rights and entitlements. In the same way, God’s Law isn’t there to protect Him – He has no need of protection! It’s there to show us the limits beyond which our behaviour is unacceptable to Him. If there’s any need for protection, it’s for us, against the wrath of God should we cross that boundary!
At the end of the previous chapter, Paul explained that “The wages of sin (one translation calls it the ‘pay-off’ of sin, because the original Greek word refers to the payment that would be made to a soldier at the end of his time of service; here it’s the end-result of our sin) is death, but,” he went on to explain the very Good News that is the basis of our Christian Faith, “the gift of God is eternal life in (or as a result of the sacrifice of) Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 6:23.)
I’d been working late; although it was a main road there was no other traffic. I was driving in thick fog. At one point I was following a white line alongside the car ... but on its left hand side! With a feeling of panic I realised I was going down the wrong side of the road, and started a correcting drift to my left. Suddenly, crash! The car came to an abrupt halt, and my near-side headlamp went out. When I looked at the damage, I found that the lamp had taken the impact from a metal post that was now leaning at about 45 degrees away from the car. At its far end was a sign saying ‘lay by’. I had not only been on the wrong side of the road, but had been driving down a lay-by on the far side!
That incident must have taken place over forty years ago, because I sold that car soon after getting engaged. What brought it to mind was the observation of some roadside posts coated with reflective paint – silver on one side and red on the other – and I thought how useful these are compared to the one I’d hit all those years ago. If that one had been painted thus, I should have seen it, even in fog! At the time, these thoughts offered a convenient illustration to the sermon I was (half-) listening to on my mp3-player. The preacher’s text was Romans chapter 7, where Paul speaks of sin having no power were it not for the law, and asks rhetorically whether the law is sin (vv.7-8.)
The next day I heard the story of Jim Thorpe, which provided another illustration for the same point. Jim was a Native American who won gold medals for both the pentathlon and decathlon at the 1912 Olympic Games. When, early in 1913, it was revealed that, in 1909-10 he had received payment (although only a few dollars) for playing baseball, his medals were taken from him. In his letter of apology he pointed out that he “did not know all about such things.” It wasn’t just that he was unaware of the rule about professionals taking part in the Games; he didn’t know that there were rules!
Whether painted or not, the roadside posts are there to mark the edge of the carriageway. They don’t protect the carriageway from the invasion of the vegetation on the other side of that edge, nor from the cars that drive on it. Whether known or not, the Olympic rules are there, not to protect the reputation of Games, but to define each competitor’s rights and entitlements. In the same way, God’s Law isn’t there to protect Him – He has no need of protection! It’s there to show us the limits beyond which our behaviour is unacceptable to Him. If there’s any need for protection, it’s for us, against the wrath of God should we cross that boundary!
At the end of the previous chapter, Paul explained that “The wages of sin (one translation calls it the ‘pay-off’ of sin, because the original Greek word refers to the payment that would be made to a soldier at the end of his time of service; here it’s the end-result of our sin) is death, but,” he went on to explain the very Good News that is the basis of our Christian Faith, “the gift of God is eternal life in (or as a result of the sacrifice of) Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 6:23.)
Sunday, 22 July 2012
Hang in there!
Do you
remember cassette tapes? Over a period
of some thirty or so years, I accumulated a collection of over 100 of them
... and that’s after giving some away! In time, I changed to CDs for my personal selection of recorded
music that I can play to myself any time I like. Long ago I bought two matching sets of
drawers, some fitted out for tapes and some for CDs, to house these next to my
stereo. More recently I realised that
the drawers were no longer fashionable, and anyway, they no longer housed a currently supportable
means of providing a musical background to domestic life. I obtained a cupboard to replace the drawers for the CDs.
But I was
still left with those tapes! I didn’t
want to lose them for, despite their low intrinsic value, many would be
difficult or even impossible to replace.
I decided that they would have to be transferred to my computer. I bought a unit from one of those catalogues
that fall out of magazine deliveries, and set to work. It was a tedious business. Once the software had been installed, each
tape had to be listened to in real playback time, and the extent of
each track noted. Then the tracks had
to be isolated and labelled on the screen before they could be finally saved. After completing only six tapes, I gave up,
and the unit lay unused at the back of a cupboard. When I changed my computer’s hard disk, I
didn’t bother about re-installing that particular program.
What I
really wanted was something that would just soak up the data, rather like a
scanner soaks up a photograph, and - plop! - there it is on the computer with no more effort than the click
of a mouse. Last summer, I saw
something that looked just right, and at little more than half the cost of the
redundant unit in my cupboard. It
arrived bright, shiny and smart, and full of promise. I set to unpacking it and setting it up
beside the computer. Then I installed
the software. Oh, no! It was the same program I'd had before! I should still have to go through that same
painstaking process if I wanted to preserve those treasured recordings!
It was about
then that news broke of the inner city riots and, like many people, I marvelled at the looting, the greed,
and the something-for-nothing culture that seemed to be motivating at least
some of the young people involved.
Instant gratification has become part of normal life today, whether it
is the acquisition of goods, or seeing a whole project completed in ‘the click
of a mouse’. My prayer notes directed me
that morning to James’s letter: “Be
patient, then, brothers, until the Lord’s coming. See how the farmer waits for the land to
yield its valuable crop and how patient he is for the autumn and spring
rains. You too, be patient and stand
firm ... As you know, we consider blessed those who have persevered. You have heard of Job’s perseverance and have
seen what the Lord finally brought about.
The Lord is full of compassion and mercy.” (James 5:7-8a,11.)
So, it will be worth it after all!Wednesday, 11 July 2012
Cures and Remedies
What’s your
reaction when something breaks, or no longer works properly? It might be big or small, but nothing lasts
for ever, they say, and at times like that decisions have to be made. Inevitably these will be broadly either a) ‘find
the remedy/repair/spare part and fix it: it could be as good as new in a few
minutes/days/months,’ or b) ‘throw it away and get another one/start again.’
Some years
ago, when my first wife told me she was seeing someone else – and why – a
friend made us a very generous offer: he and his wife would look after our
children while we went off for a week to his holiday home on the Suffolk coast,
to spend some quality time getting to know each other properly again, hopefully
enabling us to sort out our problems. At
the time we both felt things had gone too far for that: we turned
down the offer, and rejected the possibility of saving our marriage. Our decision was firmly in the ‘throw away
and get a new one’ category. Sadly her
new relationship lasted only a few months, and each of us then passed through
several lonely years.
I was
reminded of this a few months ago when I confronted the fact that my new mobile phone
appeared not to be working properly. I
won’t bore you with the symptoms, but the upshot was that it had become
unreliable. I rang the phone company,
and spoke to a technician who guided me through the necessary steps to return
the phone to its original settings.
Despite many misgivings, and my certainty that what I really needed
was a replacement phone, I persevered and tried to use it normally over the
next week or so, to see whether the reset had done the trick.
As the days
passed, and the phone did indeed seem to be working properly, I found my
misgivings diminished. It was a slow
process, however; only gradually did I learn to accept that the remedy had
worked. This experience was the opposite
of the marital situation to which I have compared it. As I reflected on these ‘reject or repair’ decisions
my thoughts touched on the Old Testament story of Jonah.
You will recall how, after first rejecting God’s instructions, the
prophet eventually went to Nineveh and was so successful in his mission that
the people turned to God in shame and repentance. Jonah couldn’t really believe this, and found
it difficult to accept the result.
So, what can
I – indeed all of us, now I’ve shared the matter – take from this? Well, we can resolve to turn to God in
the first instance when trouble
strikes, and not to leave it until other avenues have been exhausted; having done that, we ought to feel secure in the knowledge that He CAN change things – even people!Sunday, 1 July 2012
Eavesdropping
The other week, I witnessed an odd exchange on the
supermarket car park. The wife was
overtaken by her husband at a gentle trot.
As he passed her she must have asked why he was running. I caught just part of his response: that he
was going to tell …. “I’ve already told her,” she protested, walking briskly to
keep up with him. Her husband didn’t
ease his pace, “But I need to explain,” he announced, and jogged off to the far
side of the car park. The defeated wife
turned back, presumably towards their own vehicle.
Now, what was going on here? Several questions came to mind. The wife was clearly puzzled. She had
already imparted the necessary information to the third party; what additional
explanation ought she to have provided? What had prompted the husband’s hasty mission? Didn’t he trust his wife to inform whoever of
the complete situation, or was he concerned that she might have misrepresented
his part in whatever had made this message necessary? Was some subterfuge involved? Did he need to impart to this unknown and
unseen female some detail of which his wife was unaware? (Can you see the mind of the wannabe novelist
at work here?)
Another completely different interpretation might apply, of
course. These two were of an age that
they might have had a teenage daughter.
Maybe she had travelled with them to the town centre, and was meeting
friends there. Mother had told her that
they would expect her home at teatime; father, however, wanted to dot i’s and
cross t’s. Maybe he wanted to issue
strict instructions as to her behaviour, or tell her where they would be during
the afternoon, should she need to call them.
When it comes to the variety of stories that have grown up
around a definite set of facts, little can be more prolific than religion. The number of so-called ‘Christian’ sects is
scarcely measurable. When we are faced
with unfamiliar rituals or cults, or with another mainstream religion such as
Islam or Judaism, it is all too easy for traditional Christians to reject them
out of hand, and have nothing to do with them. While this might be the right response, I feel
we ought always to examine these differing beliefs, and discover on what they
are based. What are the basic facts
behind them? Do they coincide with those
of true Christianity: Jesus the only Son of God, incarnate, sacrificed for the
sins of mankind, resurrected, and returned to Heaven where He intercedes on
behalf of believers? Are some of these
elements twisted or missing, or subject to inappropriate additions, further
conditions and so on? We are warned
(Rev. 22:18-19) about adding to or subtracting from God’s Word, and surely the
same applies to the teaching of His Church.
That supermarket incident is now some weeks ago; the couple were
totally unknown. And, even if they could
be located, would they recall a minor exchange that, to them, was part the cut
and thrust of normal life? One thing is
virtually certain, however. They had no
idea that their words would become a subject of Christian teaching!
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Kicking the Habit
I’m fairly
certain that you’ve never thought of Paul’s letter to the Galatians in the
context of a mis-delivered pint of beer!
A couple of
years ago I thought I’d overcome my anxiety about the regular flow of work
(being self-employed, time without work is time without income), and learned to
trust in God to provide. Then I realised the other day that, such good
resolutions notwithstanding, I’m still measuring whether or not I’ve had a good
week by the likely income at the end of it, rather than whether it has been one
of worthy service to others, or has brought me closer to God. This idea of clinging to old habits led to the
strange juxtaposition noted above.
Some of the
most bizarre stories are also the funniest, and the ones that seem to stick in
my mind. I remembered this one concerning
a man who suffered with a deformed neck, the consequence of which was that his
head was off-centre compared to his body.
One day in his local, he met a physiotherapist who was holidaying in the
area. The man observed his condition,
and with one swift manipulation cured his deformity. Drinks were ordered to celebrate; our hero said
“Cheers!” ... and promptly tossed his pint over his shoulder!
When we
invite Jesus to be Lord of our life, we may take some time – perhaps a number
of years! – to appreciate fully the extent to which He has changed us. St Paul wrote to the Galatians, “... don’t
let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. ... You who are trying
to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ. ... You were
running a good race. Who cut in on you
and kept you from obeying the truth? ... You ... were called to be free.”
(Galatians 5:1,4,7,13)
Like the
readers of Paul’s letter, we may have drifted back to, or have never left, habits
in our life that are really only relics of the past: aspects of behaviour, or
reactions to other people that are totally out of kilter with our new life in Christ. They were so much part of our old life, and
so normal for us then, that we don’t realise that the arrival of God’s Holy
Spirit has made them redundant or defeated.
Or maybe we do realise this,
but somehow seem powerless to overcome them.
Do you –
like me – have something like that in your life that needs overturning,
rejecting and clearing out? Maybe you have a close friend who would pray with
you about it. After all, ‘a problem
shared is a problem halved,’ they say.
And if it’s a problem shared with Jesus, that proportion has to be
infinitely smaller!
Monday, 11 June 2012
Bronze Beauty
(with apologies to Anna Sewell)
I am first used – After I was minted I was taken, along with hundreds of my friends,
to a big bank. All of us were packed
into bags, and although we were all in the dark, inside a big canvas sack, none
of us was frightened, because we were all together. Then one day two sacksful of us were taken to
a supermarket where, after a short while laying on a shelf, we were emptied
into a noisy cash drawer. Here we were
forced to make friends with other, older pennies that had been all over the
world, it seemed – oh the stories they told!
Given in change – One day, I was snatched up, along with one of those older pennies,
and handed over to a little old woman.
She grumbled as she took us, “Not a lot of good giving me these – you
can’t get anything with twopence these days!”
Still muttering as she walked along, she stuffed us into a tiny pocket
in her jacket. Later we felt quite
air-sick, as we were swung in the air and jerked to and fro. There was a
metallic ‘chink’ and the movement stopped; a click, and all was even darker
than before.
Life in a pocket – Apart from the darkness, the two things I chiefly remember about the
next month or so were the strong smell of mothballs, and the stony
silence. Everywhere I’d been up to then
there had been background noise, chattering voices, things being moved around,
and so on. Here there was nothing – it
was as if life itself was suspended.
I am found
– There were occasions when there was a click, and light burst briefly into our
isolation; there was a rustling, and then all was darkness again. Then one day in one of these bright
intervals, came that same swinging in the air that we had experienced
before. There was gentle, regular movement;
the jacket was being worn again.
Tossed away
– It was clear we had entered a large building, for every sound we heard was
echoing around us; there was talking, music and singing. All at once we were flying through the air,
and with a crash we landed on a big metal plate, amongst lots more money. Then we were left in peace and were, for the
first time it seemed, in bright daylight.
It was quite dazzling.
The voice
– From somewhere I thought I heard a voice, but the bright light had made me a
bit light-headed; maybe it was just in my mind.
It said, “This poor widow has put in more than all of them.” (St. Luke
21:3.)
You may think yourself
unimportant, or of little value to anyone, but just remember how appreciated you are by God!Sunday, 3 June 2012
Close Season
In an earlier article, I revealed my interest in football, particularly that section of the game known as ‘Non-League’. I’m pleased this year to note that two teams from my native Norfolk have earned promotion to Step 4. Although this is a significant achievement, it’s still four leagues below N-Power League Two, and even further away from Norwich City in the Barclays Premiership! There is a complete pyramidal structure of these lower leagues, and I’m fascinated at the end of the season to follow the many play-off sequences, and see which teams will move up through the various levels. Some teams, however, don’t move the way that their final positions would indicate. Maybe their ground isn’t up to the required standard, or perhaps their economic situation won’t stand the financial pressures in a higher league.
St Paul knew about sport; in his first letter to the infant church in Corinth he wrote about runners competing in a race, and encouraged his readers to “Run in such a way as to get the prize.” He also described his own practice, “I don’t run like a man running aimlessly,” he wrote, “I don’t fight like a man beating the air.” (I Cor. 9:24,26.) Paul emphasised the need to do things positively; with gusto, we might say. He was anxious that these new believers should not succumb to the many temptations that could overwhelm their fragile faith. He compared their situation to that of the Israelites wandering in the desert in the time of Moses. He used the example of those who died there to warn the Corinthians to be strong in their faith, to recognise the dangers and turn aside from tempting distractions before it was too late.
Jesus, too, was tempted. The story is in St Luke’s Gospel, and at the end of it we can return to the football analogy for, in the King James’ version we read, “... and when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.” (Luke 4:13.) This wasn’t a football season, of course; nor was it summer, autumn or winter. The NIV translation explains it: “until an opportune time.” Such an opportune time might have been the occasion in the Garden of Gethsemane, when Jesus asked, “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me” (Luke 22:42.) The words that follow reveal His strength, “Yet not my will but yours be done.”
So, on the strength of your current form, where will you be playing next season?
St Paul knew about sport; in his first letter to the infant church in Corinth he wrote about runners competing in a race, and encouraged his readers to “Run in such a way as to get the prize.” He also described his own practice, “I don’t run like a man running aimlessly,” he wrote, “I don’t fight like a man beating the air.” (I Cor. 9:24,26.) Paul emphasised the need to do things positively; with gusto, we might say. He was anxious that these new believers should not succumb to the many temptations that could overwhelm their fragile faith. He compared their situation to that of the Israelites wandering in the desert in the time of Moses. He used the example of those who died there to warn the Corinthians to be strong in their faith, to recognise the dangers and turn aside from tempting distractions before it was too late.
Jesus, too, was tempted. The story is in St Luke’s Gospel, and at the end of it we can return to the football analogy for, in the King James’ version we read, “... and when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.” (Luke 4:13.) This wasn’t a football season, of course; nor was it summer, autumn or winter. The NIV translation explains it: “until an opportune time.” Such an opportune time might have been the occasion in the Garden of Gethsemane, when Jesus asked, “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me” (Luke 22:42.) The words that follow reveal His strength, “Yet not my will but yours be done.”
Ecclesiastes, the Preacher of the Old Testament, wrote, “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven” (Eccl. 3:1.) The succeeding verses have been made into a popular song, and indicate a variety of activities for which there is an appropriate time or season. A season is thus an identifiable unit in the great pattern of life.
One of my favourite hymns is ‘Just as I am, without one plea’; a phrase from that hymn always brings a catch to my throat as I sing it, and it comes to my mind in this context, too: “Here for a season, then above, O Lamb of God, I come.” While it puts into perspective how important it is to keep an eye on the opposition, and always play hard to win, it reminds us too that we are playing for the greatest and most forgiving Manager of all time!
So, on the strength of your current form, where will you be playing next season?
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
A Different View
Last summer I enjoyed a holiday
based at my cousin's home at Eastwood in Nottinghamshire. One evening, I decided to travel to Buxton to watch Eastwood
Town play their first pre-season friendly match against the club there. Unfortunately the result was a home win, but
I’m sure the game was beneficial to both teams.
As I overheard someone near to me saying at the other match I watched
that week at Alfreton, “all goals are helpful, even the ones scored against you!” –
the home team lost that match 4-1, playing against the Football League side, Chesterfield.
Now, when I watch a match I
usually position myself, if possible, somewhere near the halfway line. This has much to do with my eyesight, for I
find it difficult to determine just what is happening at one goalmouth if
viewed from the other end of the ground.
Present at that Buxton-Eastwood match was one spectator who, being
dressed in a business suit, stood out from the crowd. I believe him to be a director of Eastwood
Town, and I noticed that, for much of the second half, he was positioned behind
the goal that Eastwood were attacking.
Presumably this was to
focus on his team’s performance in that particular aspect of their game. His purpose was different from that of a
neutral spectator like me, so he deliberately secured a viewpoint that was most
beneficial for him. It’s not every day
that one encounters a football director, so I hope I may be forgiven for placing
undue emphasis on the experience. But it
did set me thinking about his interest in the game, and the responsibilities he
holds regarding football in the town and to the club in particular.
My Bible readings that week
had been from the book of Job, and I related this experience to the end of
that book. After Job’s friends have each
had their say about his situation, Job turns to God to justify himself, demanding
to know whatever evidence there might be against him to result in all his
suffering (ch.31.) The young man Elihu
then puts in his twopence worth, delaying the account of God’s response to Job (and
thus reminding us that He answers us in His own good time … not ours!) Finally comes the reply, and it’s not a
point-for-point rebuttal of Job’s protestations of innocence. For the detail, I invite you to read chapters
38 & 39 – but take a deep breath first!
In summary, The Lord makes Job aware that there is another dimension to
all of this that is beyond his understanding.
When we are baffled by something that just doesn’t
make sense, we would do well to realise that there is probably a completely
different way to look at the situation.
Then we may find ourselves echoing Job’s words at 42:3, “Surely I spoke
of things I didn’t understand, things too wonderful for me to know.”
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Granddad
Can you imagine it? “What
are you thinking about, granddad?” “Things
before you were born, my dear ... things before your mother was born!”
Grandfather is looking back down the years, to a time perhaps fifty
years ago, when he was at school, or perhaps in his teens or twenties. Maybe he even remembers in his own childhood
asking his grandfather the same
thing, and getting a similar response.
This whole subject fascinates me, and I sometimes wonder about how far back just a few generations can take us. If my grandparents in their childhood had asked about their grandparents’ early memories, the answers would have brought to mind days of great change: the days of the 1820’s and -30’s, when a number of famous Acts of Parliament introduced Catholic emancipation, electoral reform and a broadening of the way that the poor were relieved. In fact, two of my great-great-grandfathers would have remembered, at the age of 16, news of the battle of Waterloo!
This whole subject fascinates me, and I sometimes wonder about how far back just a few generations can take us. If my grandparents in their childhood had asked about their grandparents’ early memories, the answers would have brought to mind days of great change: the days of the 1820’s and -30’s, when a number of famous Acts of Parliament introduced Catholic emancipation, electoral reform and a broadening of the way that the poor were relieved. In fact, two of my great-great-grandfathers would have remembered, at the age of 16, news of the battle of Waterloo!
How different life would have been in those days, just three
life-times away! It’s thoughts like this
that call to mind the fact that life itself is composed of changes, be they big
or small. Look for instance at the
dramatic advances in communication media over just the last five years – or the
fashions of a few years ago and how out of place they’d seem today. This month many will be watching the FA Cup
Final; you probably know that a regular part of the preliminaries to this
annual event is the singing of that famous hymn, Abide with me. Do you
remember the words of the second verse?
“Change and decay in all around I see: O Thou who changest not, abide
with me.”
Are there people whose mood seems to change like the
weather; people on whom you can’t depend, with whom you have to spend a while
in silence, waiting to know just how to address them today? Such people carry uncertainty with them, like
a cloud, and if your circumstances mean that you are frequently in their
company, life itself can become quite unbearable. How refreshing it is that our God is just the
opposite. As Francis Lyte reminded us in
that hymn, God never changes. And we don’t just have to take his word for
it. Our Bibles tell us of “the Father of
the heavenly lights, who doesn’t change like shifting shadows” (Jas. 1:17), and
this echoes other verses, like “I say my purpose will stand; I will do all that
I please” (Is. 46:10), “I, the Lord, do not change.” (Mal. 3:6) and “God’s
gifts and His call are irrevocable.” (Rom. 11:29).
We have just celebrated Easter, and the gift of salvation
marked by Jesus’ death on the Cross and His Resurrection. Isn’t this evidence enough of God standing by
his promises, doing what he pleases, never changing? Next time you see grandparents and
grandchildren together, imagine their conversation. Consider the vast range of their experiences:
the changes that they have seen, and that will take place over their collective
lifetimes, and reflect on the eternal, unchanging nature of our Lord.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)